Choice of European Super Second Generation Image Intensifier Technology and its Further Development
-
摘要: 二代像增强器采用Na2KSb光电阴极,三代像增强器却采用GaAs光电阴极。由于GaAs光电阴极具有更高的阴极灵敏度,因此三代像增强器的性能远高于二代像增强器。在二代像增强器基础上发展的超二代像增强器,阴极灵敏度有了很大提高,因此性能也有很大提高,同时大大缩短了与三代像增强器的性能差距。超二代像增强器属于Na2KSb材料体系,生产成本低,与三代像增强器相比性价比较高,所以欧洲的像增强器产商选择了超二代像增强器技术的发展路线。超二代与三代像增强器技术并行发展了30多年,两者性能均有大幅提高。超二代与三代像增强器的性能差距主要体现在极低照度(<10-4 lx)条件下,而在其它照度条件下,性能基本相当。超二代像增强器的性能仍有提高的空间。增益方面,在微通道板的通道内壁上制作高二次电子发射系数的材料膜层可以提高增益;信噪比方面,采用光栅窗可提高阴极灵敏度,从而提高信噪比;分辨力方面,在微通道板输出端制作半导体膜层、采用高清荧光屏均可提高分辨力。阴极灵敏度是光电阴极的指标,不是像增强器的整体性能指标。阴极灵敏度对像增强器整体性能的影响体现在增益、信噪比以及等效背景照度指标中。无论是超二代还是三代像增强器,都区分不同的型号。不同型号的超二代或三代像增强器性能均不相同。超二代和三代像增强器的性能指标是在A光源条件下测量的,而A光源光谱分布与实际应用环境中的光谱分布并不等同,同时Na2KSb和GaAs光电阴极的光谱分布不相同,所以超二代和三代像增强器的信噪比、分辨力等性能指标不具备可比性。Abstract: The second-generation image intensifier adopts a Na2KSb photocathode, whereas the third-generation image intensifier adopts a GaAs photocathode. Given that GaAs photocathodes have a higher cathode sensitivity, the performance of the third-generation image intensifier is much higher than that of the second-generation image intensifier. The super second-generation image intensifier, developed on the basis of the second-generation image intensifier, has been greatly improved in terms of cathode sensitivity, and thus, its performance has also been greatly improved. Simultaneously, the gap with the third-generation image intensifier has been significantly shortened. Super second-generation image intensifiers belong to the material technology of Na2KSb, with low production cost and high cost performance compared with those of third-generation image intensifiers. Therefore, European image intensifier manufacturers chose the development roadmap for super second-generation image intensifiers. Super second- and third-generation image intensifier technologies have been developed in parallel for more than 30 years, and their performance has been greatly improved. The performance gap between super second- and third-generation image intensifiers is primarily reflected under conditions of extremely low illumination (<10−4 lx); the performance remains basically unchanged for levels above that. The performance of super-second-generation image intensifiers can still be improved. In terms of the gain, they can be improved by depositing a film of high secondary electron emission material on the inner wall of the microchannel plate. With respect to the signal-to-noise ratio, the grating window was introduced to improve the cathode sensitivity, thereby improving the signal-to-noise ratio. The resolution can be improved by inserting a semiconductor film at the output of the microchannel plate and adopting a high-definition fluorescent screen. Cathode sensitivity is a parameter of the photocathode components and not the overall performance parameter of the image intensifier. The influence of the cathode sensitivity on the overall performance of the image intensifier is embodied in the gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and equivalent background illumination. Different models are employed to distinguish between super second- and third-generation image intensifiers. These models give rise to different levels of performance. The performance parameters of super second- and third-generation image intensifiers are measured under the condition of a light source, but the spectral distribution in the actual application environment is not the same as that of the light source. The spectral responses of Na2KSb and GaAs photocathodes are different. Therefore, performance parameters such as signal-to-noise ratio and resolution of the super-second-generation and third-generation image intensifiers are not comparable.
-
0. 引言
快速反射镜(fast steering mirror, FSM)是一种通过控制反射镜的偏转角度调整光束传播方向,实现收发两端的光束精确对准的装置。由于这类装置具有响应速度快、控制精度高等优点,快速反射镜已经被广泛应用于自由空间通信、扫描共焦显微镜、大型天文望远镜等光学系统中[1-3],成为光束指向控制系统中应用最广泛的核心器件。
快速反射镜的机械结构主要由驱动元件、支撑结构和负载组成[4]。驱动元件包括音圈电机(voice coil motor, VCM)和压电驱动器(piezoelectric actuators, PEAs),由音圈电机驱动的快速反射镜具有高驱动行程、高加速度等优势,然而音圈电机输出驱动力有限,因此为了保证足够的偏摆范围,快速反射镜的支撑结构偏摆刚度不能太大,这就造成其谐振频率相对较低[5]。例如,2020年Tadahiko Shinshi等人提出了一种由音圈电机驱动的快速反射镜,其尖端倾斜范围可达±20 mrad,轴向带宽仅为200 Hz[6]。
压电驱动器具有高驱动力、高频响、高分辨率等优势,然而受到输出位移量小(仅为驱动器自身长度的0.1%~0.15%)以及不能承受侧向或拉伸载荷等缺点的限制[7]。而快速反射镜的支撑结构——柔性机构具有无需装配、无摩擦、响应速度快等优点,将柔性机构作为预紧和位移放大机构与压电驱动器组成压电驱动快速反射镜[8-9]。此类系统兼具压电陶瓷与柔性机构的优点,因而被广泛地应用于精确激光束控制等超精密系统。2010年向思桦等人采用单级桥式放大构型设计的快速反射镜具有较高一阶固有频率,但放大比较小,导致快速反射镜偏转角度较小[10]。2015年袁刚等人采用单级桥式放大构型设计的快速反射镜具有较大的偏转角,然而由于该柔性铰链的刚度较小,导致构型固有频率较低,仅为180.4 Hz[11]。2018年邵恕宝等人提出的压电驱动快反镜采用一级杆式构型可实现两轴±7 mrad的倾斜范围,同时两轴带宽高于810 Hz[12]。2019年Kim等人和2021年谢永等人均采用两级杠杆放大机构,保证了构型有较大的放大比,但其频响较低[13-14]。
现有快速反射镜柔性机构通常采用多级单一放大构型以增加放大比。然而,由于缺乏针对不同级数、不同构型之间性能特征的定量分析,设计过程缺乏选型依据[15-16],导致现有快速反射镜普遍存在偏转范围小、扫描频率低的共性问题。由于快速反射镜在运动时,会受到一些来自平台或者外界环境的干扰,导致快速反射镜的视轴稳定性下降,因此在控制快速反射镜运动需要能够对多源干扰准确估计和有效抑制的控制方法[17-18]。同时,压电陶瓷存在迟滞、蠕变特性,这种由驱动元件材料引起的非线性特性增加了控制方法设计的复杂程度[14]。
本研究针对柔性机构构型级数与放大比之间的关系开展了定量分析,得出了嵌套级数的选择依据。针对不同构型方案的固有频率和放大比进行仿真分析,得出了三级混合构型的设计方案。开展了柔性机构离散化处理,构建了柔性机构的通用动力刚度模型,得出柔性机构结构参数与快速反射镜偏转角度的映射关系。在此基础上,对快速反射镜柔性机构关键尺寸参数进行优化,以快速反射镜偏转角度最大化为优化目标,得到优化参数与偏转角度及固有频率的关系。为快速反射镜的设计以及柔性铰链等单元的参数优化提供了理论依据。与国内外同类研究相比,该机构可以在保证较高一阶固有频率的基础上实现100 mrad机械偏转角度。
1. 压电驱动快速反射镜的工作原理
快速反射镜通过PEAs驱动柔性机构引导平面反射镜快速摆动实现光束指向的精准调控,其工作原理如图 1所示。图 1(b)表示在驱动力±Fx和±Fy等距分布于反射镜底部,图 1(a)表示在驱动力作用下反射镜偏转α(即机械偏转角度),反射光线则由l1偏转至l2,偏转角为β(即光学偏转角度)。
2. 三级混合柔性机构构型设计
对快速反射镜输出偏转角和带宽影响最大的部分是支撑结构(柔性机构),其主要常见材料有钛合金(TC4)、镁合金(AZ91)、铝合金(AL7075)、低锰弹簧钢(65Mn)等。本文以上述材料为选材目标,以一级桥式放大机构为例,使用ANSYS Workbench软件对构型进行分析,设置柔性机构材料如表 1所示,逐一比较快速反射镜采用这些材料时的各项参数。
表 1 柔性机构材料各项参数Table 1. Material parameters of flexible mechanismMaterial Elastic modulus/GPa Ultimate strength /MPa Yield limit /MPa Magnificationratio (R) Natural frequency/Hz Titanium alloy(TC4) 117 902 824 1.943 739.66 Magnesium alloy(AZ91) 45 230 160 1.943 810.62 Aluminium alloy(AL7075) 71 572 503 1.944 813.73 Low manganese spring steel(65Mn) 197 980 785 1.945 827.33 如表 1所示,具有最大放大比的材料是低锰弹簧钢(65Mn),但是低锰弹簧钢加工前需要热处理,同时该材料在淬火后容易产生裂纹;钛合金(TC4)具有较大弹性模量,但是分析结果表明其固有频率较低;镁合金(AZ91)的弹性模量、强度极限和屈服极限这3项参数较低,不适合本文的柔性放大机构;与其它材料相比,铝合金具有高放大比、高带宽、高弹性模量和无需热处理的优势,因此本文采用铝合金(AL7075)加工快速反射镜支撑结构。
柔性铰链主要分为杆式构型和桥式构型,其中杆式构型的放大比受杠杆尺寸影响较大,单级杆式构型在保证其放大比前提下难以兼顾杠杆尺寸。与杠杆机构相比,桥式机构具有结构紧凑且无寄生位移的优势。由于单级构型可提供的放大比有限,在快速反射镜柔性机构设计过程中通常采用多级构型。然而,过多放大构型的多级嵌套组合会导致结构尺寸和输入刚度的增大,因此在设计过程中需要首先考虑嵌套级数和构型方式。
首先,开展柔性机构的级数分析。为保证结构紧凑,初步设定桥式构型与杆式构型的每一级构型的主要尺寸如表 2所示,其构型如图 2所示。
表 2 各级构型的主要参数Table 2. The main parameters of each configurationParameter Lever type configuration Bridge type configuration θ/° - 13.5 L/mm 15 18 H/mm 5 5 t/mm 0.8 0.8 h/mm 2.5 - PEAs驱动多级柔性机构过程中,动力源于PEAs逆压电作用产生的驱动力,在该驱动力作用下第一级机构(由PEAs直接驱动的柔性铰链)发生弹性形变输出位移,该位移使后一级机构产生弹性形变并逐级向后驱动。可以发现,前一级机构的输出力是后一级机构的驱动力,而前一级机构的输出位移受到后一级机构的阻滞。因此,多级柔性机构是单向耦合的。构建柔性机构阻滞模型需要完成精确的力学建模和复杂的积分运算,工作量巨大。因此在确定柔性机构级数时通常依赖于设计者的经验,缺乏级数与柔性机构输出性能之间的定量分析。如图 3所示,本文基于有限元理论,针对桥式构型和杆式构型级数与柔性机构输出放大比之间关系分别开展了定量分析。
如图 3所示,一级桥式构型放大比与一级杆式构型放大比较为接近(分别为3.9、3.5);在两级构型中,桥式构型放大比到达峰值(8.6),杆式构型放大比(11.0)优于桥式构型。在三级构型中,桥式构型放大比产生较大衰减,杆式构型放大比到达峰值(12.3);在四级及以上构型中,桥式构型和杆式构型放大比均出现持续衰减。因此,采用柔性机构嵌套级数为三级。
针对三级柔性机构四种构型方案的固有频率和放大比进行分析,分析结果如图 4所示。图 4(a)为三级杆式构型,该结构具有较高的固有频率和放大比。然而,纯杆式构型很难保证柔性机构的紧凑性。图 4(b)为一级桥式构型与两级杆式构型组合,其固有频率和放大比均低于方案(a)。图 4(c)为两级桥式构型与一级杆式构型相结合的设计方案,该方案为压电驱动器预留足够的安装空间且具有20.1倍的位移放大比和较高的一阶固有频率。图 4(d)为三级桥式构型,其一阶固有频率和放大比都很低。因此,本文采用了两级桥式构型与一级杆式构型相结合的设计方案。
快速反射镜整体机构如图 5所示,在两级桥式放大机构之间放置PEAs,由PEAs直接输出位移,两级桥式放大构型与杆式构型相连,经杆式机构放大,在光学反射镜底部实现输出。由于快速反射镜驱动组件在装置底部通过柔性铰链相连,所以当快速反射镜发生偏转时,可能存在交叉耦合现象。采取如图 5所示沿圆周方向均布柔性机构的方式减小交叉耦合现象。
3. 快速反射镜柔性机构建模及动力学分析
如图 5所示,三级混合柔性机构通过柔性直梁与反射镜底座相连,组成一个多自由度复杂机构。针对这类复杂机构的动态响应分析,首先需要对机构进行离散化处理,建立每个柔性铰链和刚体的动力学模型,最后建立整个机构的动力学模型。
将构型离散化后可知构型由柔性直梁、集中质量和刚体组成,进一步将构型的柔性直梁进行顺序编号从(1)~(44),固定端编号为(0),而所有的柔性直梁是由1到25个节点连接,其中节点3、4、9、10、15、16、21和22为质量为m1的集中质量,节点6、12、18和24为质量为m2的刚体,节点25为质量为m3的刚体。如图 6所示,将第一组柔性放大机构与输出平台离散化为柔性直梁、刚体和集中质量,其余3组柔性放大机构离散化类同于第一组。
3.1 柔性直梁动力学分析
对柔性机构的动态分析中首先需要对柔性铰链进行分析,而本文构型所包含的柔性铰链均为柔性直梁。如图 7所示,柔性直梁的两个节点j和k包含6个自由度,分别是$ x_j^{\rm{e}}(\omega ) = \left[ {{u_j};{v_j};{w_j};{\alpha _j};} \right.{\beta _j};\left. {{\gamma _j}} \right] $;和$ x_k^{\text{e}}(\omega ) = \left[ {{u_k};{v_k};{w_k};{\alpha _k};{\beta _k};{\gamma _k}} \right] $,$ \left[ {{u_j};} \right.{v_j};\left. {{w_j}} \right] $和$\left[ {{u_k};{v_k};{w_k}} \right]$表示沿坐标轴方向的位移,$\left[ {{\alpha _j};} \right.{\beta _j};\left. {{\gamma _j}} \right]$和$\left[ {{\alpha _k};{\beta _k};{\gamma _k}} \right]$表示垂直于坐标轴方向的转角。
基于矩阵位移法,柔性单元的节点力$F_j^{\text{e}}(\omega ) = \left[ {{F_{xj}};{F_{yj}};{F_{zj}};{M_{xj}};{M_{yj}};{M_{zj}}} \right] \text{,}F_k^{\text{e}}(\omega ) = \left[ {{F_{xk}};{F_{yk}};} \right.{F_{kj}};{M_{kj}};{M_{kj}};$$\left. {{M_{kj}}} \right]$和节点位移$x_j^{\text{e}}(\omega ), x_k^{\text{e}}(\omega )$满足广义胡克定律,即:
$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {F_j^{\text{e}}\left( \omega \right)} \\ {F_k^{\text{e}}\left( \omega \right)} \end{array}} \right\} = {{\boldsymbol{D}}^{\text{e}}}\left( \omega \right) \cdot \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {x_j^{\text{e}}\left( \omega \right)} \\ {x_k^{\text{e}}\left( \omega \right)} \end{array}} \right\} $$ (1) 式(1)中:De(ω)为一个柔性单元的动力刚度矩阵。
进一步分析该柔性单元的动力刚度矩阵,即:
$$ {{\boldsymbol{D}}^{\text{e}}}\left( \omega \right) = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{d_1}}&0&0&0&0&0&{{d_5}}&0&0&0&0&0 \\ {}&{{d_2}\left( {{I_z}} \right)}&0&0&0&{{d_3}\left( {{I_z}} \right)}&0&{{d_6}\left( {{I_z}} \right)}&0&0&0&{{d_7}\left( {{I_z}} \right)} \\ {}&{}&{{d_2}\left( {{I_y}} \right)}&0&{ - {d_3}\left( {{I_y}} \right)}&0&0&0&{{d_6}\left( {{I_y}} \right)}&0&{ - {d_7}\left( {{I_y}} \right)}&0 \\ {}&{}&{}&{{d_9}}&0&0&0&0&0&{{d_{10}}}&0&0 \\ {}&{}&{}&{}&{{d_4}\left( {{I_y}} \right)}&0&0&0&{{d_7}\left( {{I_y}} \right)}&0&{{d_8}\left( {{I_y}} \right)}&0 \\ {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{{d_4}\left( {{I_z}} \right)}&0&{ - {d_7}\left( {{I_z}} \right)}&0&0&0&{{d_8}\left( {{I_z}} \right)} \\ {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{{d_1}}&0&0&0&0&0 \\ {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{{d_2}\left( {{I_z}} \right)}&0&0&0&{ - {d_3}\left( {{I_z}} \right)} \\ {}&{}&{}&{}&{{\rm{sym}}}&{}&{}&{}&{{d_2}\left( {{I_y}} \right)}&0&{{d_3}\left( {{I_y}} \right)}&0 \\ {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{{d_9}}&0&0 \\ {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{{d_4}\left( {{I_y}} \right)}&0 \\ {}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{{d_4}\left( {{I_z}} \right)} \end{array}} \right] $$ (2) 式(2)中:dq(q=1, 2, …, 10)是De(ω)的系数;dq(Iy or Iz)表示该系数是和惯性矩相对于y轴或z轴的惯性矩(Iy=(t3h)/12或Iz=(t3h)/12)相关的函数。对于dq(q=1, 2, …, 10)选取二阶泰勒展开式计算,即:
$$ {d_1}{\text{ = }}\frac{{EA}}{l}\left( {1 - \frac{1}{3}{\alpha ^2} - \frac{1}{{45}}{\alpha ^4} - \cdots } \right) $$ (3) $$ {d_2}{\text{ = }}\frac{{EI}}{{{l^3}}}\left( {12 - \frac{{13}}{{35}}{\beta ^4} - \frac{{59}}{{161700}}{\beta ^8} - \cdots } \right) $$ (4) $$ {d_3}{\text{ = }}\frac{{EI}}{{{l^2}}}\left( {6 - \frac{{11}}{{210}}{\beta ^4} - \frac{{223}}{{2910600}}{\beta ^8} - \cdots } \right) $$ (5) $$ {d_4}{\text{ = }}\frac{{EI}}{l}\left( {4 - \frac{1}{{105}}{\beta ^4} - \frac{{71}}{{4365900}}{\beta ^8} - \cdots } \right) $$ (6) $$ {d_5}{\text{ = }} - \frac{{EA}}{l}\left( {1 + \frac{1}{6}{\alpha ^2} + \frac{7}{{360}}{\alpha ^4} + \cdots } \right) $$ (7) $$ {d_6}{\text{ = }} - \frac{{EI}}{{{l^3}}}\left( {12 + \frac{9}{{70}}{\beta ^4} + \frac{{1279}}{{3880800}}{\beta ^8} + \cdots } \right) $$ (8) $$ {d_7}{\text{ = }}\frac{{EI}}{{{l^2}}}\left( {6 + \frac{{13}}{{420}}{\beta ^4} + \frac{{1681}}{{23284800}} + \cdots } \right) $$ (9) $$ {d_8}{\text{ = }}\frac{{EI}}{l}\left( {2 + \frac{1}{{140}}{\beta ^4} + \frac{{1097}}{{69854400}}{\beta ^8} + \cdots } \right) $$ (10) $$ {d_9}{\text{ = }}\frac{{G{I_x}}}{l}\left( {1 - \frac{1}{3}{\gamma ^2} - \frac{1}{{45}}{\gamma ^4} - \cdots } \right) $$ (11) $$ {d_{10}}{\text{ = }} - \frac{{G{I_x}}}{l}\left( {1 + \frac{1}{6}{\gamma ^2} + \frac{7}{{360}}{\gamma ^4} + \cdots } \right) $$ (12) 式(3)~式(12)中:α2=ω2l2ρ/E;β4=ω2l4ρA/EI;γ2=ω2l2ρ/G。其中E为杨氏模量;G为剪切模量;ρ表示密度;A为横截面积;ω表示频率。
式(2)是在其局部坐标系下的动力刚度矩阵,但在动力学分析中需要将其转换到参考坐标系中。对于第i(i=1, 2, …, 44)个柔性直梁其坐标变换分析如下:
$$ {{\boldsymbol{D}}_i}\left( \omega \right) = {\boldsymbol{R}}_i^{\rm{T}} \cdot {{\boldsymbol{D}}^{\text{e}}}\left( \omega \right) \cdot {{\boldsymbol{R}}_i} $$ (13) $$ {{\boldsymbol{R}}_i} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{{\boldsymbol{\lambda}} _i}}&{{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}}&{{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}}&{{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}} \\ {{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}}&{{{\boldsymbol{\lambda}} _i}}&{{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}}&{{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}} \\ {{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}}&{{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}}&{{{\boldsymbol{\lambda}} _i}}&{{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}} \\ {{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}}&{{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}}&{{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}}&{{{\boldsymbol{\lambda}} _i}} \end{array}} \right] $$ (14) $$ {{\boldsymbol{\lambda}} _i} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\cos \left( {{x_i}, x} \right)}&{\cos \left( {{x_i}, y} \right)}&{\cos \left( {{x_i}, z} \right)} \\ {\cos \left( {{y_i}, x} \right)}&{\cos \left( {{y_i}, y} \right)}&{\cos \left( {{y_i}, z} \right)} \\ {\cos \left( {{z_i}, x} \right)}&{\cos \left( {{z_i}, y} \right)}&{\cos \left( {{z_i}, z} \right)} \end{array}} \right] $$ (15) 式(14)中:O3×3是维度为3×3的0矩阵。式(15)矩阵中每一项为第i个柔性直梁局部坐标系与参考坐标系各坐标轴之间的余弦值。
第i个柔性直梁经过坐标变换,在参考坐标系中的力与位移的关系可表示为式(16):
$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{F_{i, j}}} \\ {{F_{i, k}}} \end{array}} \right\} = {{\boldsymbol{D}}_i} \cdot \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{x_{i, j}}} \\ {{x_{i, k}}} \end{array}} \right\} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{k_{i, 1}}}&{{k_{i, 2}}} \\ {{k_{i, 3}}}&{{k_{i, 4}}} \end{array}} \right] \cdot \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{x_{i, j}}} \\ {{x_{i, k}}} \end{array}} \right\} $$ (16) 式中:$ \left\{ {{F_{i, j}}, {F_{i, k}}} \right\} $和$ \left\{ {{x_{i, j}}, {x_{i, k}}} \right\} $是参考坐标系下第i个柔性直梁的节点力和节点位移。ki, 1、ki, 2、ki, 3和ki, 4是动力刚度矩阵Di的子矩阵。
3.2 刚性体和集中质量动力学分析
刚性体(输出平台和杠杆放大机构的刚性梁)和集中质量(两级桥式放大构型的连接部分)也是分析构型动力学的重要组成单元,对于第n(n=3、4、6、9、10、12、15、16、18、21、22、24、25)个节点为刚体或集中质量的分析如式(17)、(18)和(19)所示:
$$ {{\boldsymbol{M}}_n}\left( \omega \right) = - {\omega ^2} \cdot \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{{\boldsymbol{M}}_{3 \times 3}}}&{{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}} \\ {{{\boldsymbol{O}}_{3 \times 3}}}&{{{\boldsymbol{J}}_{n, 3 \times 3}}} \end{array}} \right] $$ (17) $$ {{\boldsymbol{M}}_{3 \times 3}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} m&0&0 \\ 0&m&0 \\ 0&0&m \end{array}} \right] $$ (18) $$ {{\boldsymbol{J}}_{n, 3 \times 3}} = {\boldsymbol{\lambda}} _n^{\rm{T}} \cdot \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{J_x}}&0&0 \\ 0&{{J_y}}&0 \\ 0&0&{{J_z}} \end{array}} \right] \cdot {{\boldsymbol{\lambda}} _n} $$ (19) 式(17)、(18)和(19)中:Mn(ω)表示第n个节点为刚性体或集中质量的动力刚度矩阵;m是该单元的质量,Jx、Jy、Jz是该单元相对于质心的惯性矩。式(19)中坐标变换矩阵λn与式(15)λi计算方法一致。
3.3 柔性机构的动态响应模型
已完成在参考坐标系下所有柔性直梁、集中质量和刚体的动力刚度矩阵,进一步建立所有节点力的平衡方程组,表示为节点位移的形式,如式(20)所示:
$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} { - {f_{{\rm{in}}, 1}} = \left( {{k_{1, 1}} + {k_{2, 1}}} \right) \cdot {x_1} + {k_{1, 2}} \cdot {x_3} + {k_{2, 2}} \cdot {x_4}} \\ {{f_{{\rm{in}}, 1}} = \left( {{k_{3, 4}} + {k_{4, 4}}} \right) \cdot {x_2} + {k_{3, 3}} \cdot {x_3} + {k_{4, 3}} \cdot {x_4}} \\ {0 = {k_{1, 3}} \cdot {x_1} + {k_{3, 2}} \cdot {x_2} + \left( {{k_{1, 4}} + {k_{3, 1}} + {k_{5, 1}} + {k_{8, 1}} + {M_3}} \right) \cdot {x_3} + {k_{5, 2}} \cdot {x_5}} \\ {0 = {k_{2, 3}} \cdot {x_1} + {k_{4, 2}} \cdot {x_2} + \left( {{k_{2, 4}} + {k_{4, 1}} + {k_{6, 4}} + {k_{7, 4}} + {M_4}} \right) \cdot {x_4} + {k_{6, 3}} \cdot {x_5}} \\ {0 = {k_{5, 3}} \cdot {x_3} + {k_{6, 2}} \cdot {x_4} + \left( {{k_{5, 4}} + {k_{6, 1}} + {k_{9, 1}}} \right) \cdot {x_5} + {k_{9, 2}} \cdot {x_6}} \\ {0 = {k_{9, 3}} \cdot {x_5} + \left( {{k_{9, 4}} + {k_{10, 4}} + {k_{41, 1}} + {M_6}} \right) \cdot {x_6} + {k_{41, 2}} \cdot {x_{25}}} \\ { \cdots \cdots } \\ {{f_{\rm{o}}}\left( \omega \right) = {k_{41, 3}} \cdot {x_6} + {k_{42, 3}} \cdot {x_{12}} + {k_{43, 3}} \cdot {x_{18}} + {k_{44, 3}} \cdot {x_{24}} + \left( {{k_{41, 4}} + {k_{42, 4}} + {k_{43, 4}} + {k_{44, 4}}} \right) \cdot {x_{25}}} \end{array}} \right. $$ (20) 由于构型中压电陶瓷驱动器输入力均沿x轴方向,所以式(20)中$ {f_{in, s}}\left( \omega \right) = \left[ {{f_{in, s}};0;0;0;0;0} \right] $(s=1, 2, 3, 4), Mn已由式(18)求出,$ \left\{ {{F_{i, j}}, {F_{i, k}}} \right\} $已由式(16)求出。fo(ω)是输出平台的虚拟力,只有在求输出刚度时不为0。
柔性机构的通用动力刚度模型统一表示为:
$$ \left\{ {F\left( \omega \right)} \right\} = \left[ {{\boldsymbol{D}}\left( \omega \right)} \right] \cdot \left\{ {X\left( \omega \right)} \right\} $$ (21) 进一步将式(21)表示为柔性机构的通用动力刚度模型,即式(22):
$$ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} { - {f_{in, 1}}} \\ {{f_{in, 1}}} \\ 0 \\ \vdots \\ {{f_{\rm{o}}}\left( \omega \right)} \end{array}} \right\} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{k_{1, 1}} + {k_{2, 1}}}&0&{{k_{1, 2}}}&{{k_{2, 2}}}&0& \cdots &0 \\ 0&{{k_{3, 4}} + {k_{4, 4}}}&{{k_{3, 3}}}&{{k_{4, 3}}}&0& \cdots &0 \\ {{k_{1, 3}}}&{{k_{3, 2}}}&{{k_{1, 4}} + {k_{3, 1}} + {k_{5, 1}} + {k_{8, 1}} + {M_3}}&0&{{k_{5, 2}}}& \cdots &0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0&0&0&0&0& \ldots &{{k_{41, 4}} + {k_{42, 4}} + {k_{43, 4}} + {k_{44, 4}}} \end{array}} \right] \cdot \\ \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{x_1}} \\ {{x_2}} \\ {{x_3}} \\ \vdots \\ {{x_{25}}} \end{array}} \right\} $$ (22) 由式(22)可知输入$ \left\{ {F\left( \omega \right)} \right\} $时,输出位移为$ \left\{ {X\left( \omega \right)} \right\} $,$ \left\{ {X\left( \omega \right)} \right\} $包括输出平台的输出位移$ {x_{25}} = \left[ {{u_{25}};{v_{25}};{w_{25}};{\alpha _{25}};{\beta _{25}};{\gamma _{25}}} \right] $。构型固有频率为机构整体动力刚度矩阵$ \left[ {{\boldsymbol{D}}\left( \omega \right)} \right] $行列式为0的根。如图 8所示,纵坐标表示动力刚度矩阵$ \left[ {{\boldsymbol{D}}\left( \omega \right)} \right] $参数,横坐标表示柔性机构固有频率。当$ \left[ {{\boldsymbol{D}}\left( \omega \right)} \right] = 0 $时,一阶固有频率为309 Hz,与有限元分析结果315.49 Hz的误差为1.9%,二阶固有频率为322 Hz,与有限元分析结果315.73 Hz的误差为2.22%。
3.4 快速反射镜偏转角度
由于输出平台沿x轴、y轴方向位移和绕z轴偏转角可忽略不计,所以输出平台偏转角只与输出平台绕x轴的偏转角α25,绕y轴的偏转角β25,沿z轴的位移ω25相关,由此可以得到,偏转后输出平台平面上有三点p1=(0; cosα25; 0; sinα25+w25),p2=(cosβ25; 0; sinβ25+w25),p3=(0; 0; w25),则偏转后平台的一个法向量$ \overrightarrow {{{\boldsymbol{n}}_1}} $为:
$$ \overrightarrow {{{\boldsymbol{n}}_1}} = {\left[ \begin{gathered} - \cos {\alpha _{25}} \cdot \sin {\beta _{25}} \hfill \\ - \cos {\beta _{25}} \cdot \sin {\alpha _{25}} \hfill \\ \cos {\beta _{25}} \cdot \left( {\sin {\alpha _{25}} + {w_{25}}} \right) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right]^{\rm T}} $$ (23) 若平台未偏转,只沿z轴位移w25,则平台的一个法向量为$ \overrightarrow {{{\boldsymbol{n}}_2}} = \left[ {0, 0, c} \right] $,c是常数,进一步可得出偏转后平台偏转角αp为:
$$ {\alpha _p} = \arccos \frac{{\left| {{{\vec {\boldsymbol{n}}}_1} \cdot {{\vec {\boldsymbol{n}}}_2}} \right|}}{{\left| {{{\vec {\boldsymbol{n}}}_1}} \right| \cdot \left| {{{\vec {\boldsymbol{n}}}_2}} \right|}} $$ (24) 4. 三级混合柔性机构关键尺寸参数优化设计
在此基础上对快速反射镜柔性机构关键尺寸参数进行优化,选择桥式放大机构柔性臂的夹角θ,长度l,宽度t和高度h为待优化参数,以快速反射镜偏转角度最大化为优化目标,得到优化参数与偏转角度和固有频率的关系如图 9~图 12所示。
如图 9所示,柔性臂的夹角变化范围为11°~25°,其他参数固定不变。红色曲线表示柔性臂夹角与快速反射镜偏转角之间的关系,随着柔性臂夹角增加,快速反射镜偏转角呈现先增后减趋势,当夹角θ=18°时,快速反射镜偏转角度到达最大值。黑色曲线表示柔性臂夹角与柔性机构固有频率之间的关系。随着柔性臂夹角增加,固有频率呈现先减后增趋势,当夹角θ=20°时,固有频率到达峰值最小值。
如图 10~图 12所示,分别对柔性臂长度l,宽度t和高度h与快速反射镜偏转角之间的关系进行分析。可以发现,随着控制变量参数值增加,快速反射镜偏转角都呈现出先增后减的趋势。结合上述分析,选取参数应靠近最佳参数,同时考虑到结构的固有频率ω不宜过低、结构紧凑等因素,本文最终选取优化结果为:θ=18°、l=20 mm、t=0.9 mm、h=6.5 mm、ω=336 Hz、αp=50 mrad。
对快速反射镜进行仿真分析,设PEAs输出最大位移为16 μm,则柔性机构位移仿真结果如图 13所示,根据输出位移最大值,可以求出最大偏转角αp为100.8 mrad。模态仿真分析如图 14所示,一阶固有频率为336.4 Hz,二阶固有频率为336.63 Hz。
如表 3所示,将国内外同类研究与本研究成果进行对比可知,本文设计的压电驱动快速反射镜具有结构紧凑、偏转角度大的优势。
表 3 快速反射镜关键参数对比Table 3. Comparison of key parameters of fast steering mirrorReference Piezoelectric actuator length /mm Number of deflection degrees of freedom Mechanical deflection range around x axis/mrad Mechanical deflection range around y axis /mrad First natural frequency /Hz Ref. [10] - 1 - 24 1872 Ref. [11] - 1 - 52.3 180 Ref. [16] - 2 4.8 4.8 6700 Ref. [13] - 2 21 21 349 Ref. [14] 72 2 52.93 55.41 105.45 This paper 36 2 100 100 336 5. 总结与展望
本文针对柔性机构构型级数与放大比之间的关系开展了定量分析,得出了嵌套级数的选择依据。针对不同构型方案的固有频率和放大比进行仿真分析,得出了三级混合构型的设计方案。进一步将整体构型离散化为柔性铰链、刚性体和集中质量等基本单元,并计算各单元在参考坐标系中的刚度矩阵。结合矩阵位移法,建立了整个柔性机构的动态响应模型,为柔性铰链、刚性体等单元的参数优化提供了理论依据。最后,对柔性机构开展了模态分析,验证了动态响应模型的能够较为准确地描述快速反射镜的动态行为。与国内外同类研究相比,该机构可以在保证较高一阶固有频率的基础上实现100 mrad机械偏转角度。本文侧重于大转角快速反射镜柔性机构的优化设计与动态分析,针对压电驱动快速反射镜的控制方法研究将在后续工作中开展。
-
表 1 二代和三代像增强器的主要区别
Table 1 Major differences between Gen Ⅱ and Gen Ⅲ image intensifier
Image intensifier GEN Ⅱ GEN Ⅲ Characteristic Input window Fiber-optic plate Glass Glass has higher transmission AR film - Si3N4 GaAs cathode has lower reflection Photocathode Na2KSb GaAs GaAs cathode has higher PR Cathode voltage 200 V > 400 V - Ion barrier - Al2O3 Ion barrier will decrease SNR Sealing technology Thermal sealing Cold sealing Thermal sealing is easier Vacuum < 10-5 Pa < 10-8 Pa The higher the vacuum, the more expensive the equipment 表 2 二代与三代像增强器的主要性能比较
Table 2 Major parameters of Gen Ⅱ and Gen Ⅲ image intensifier
Image intensifier Gen Ⅱ Gen Ⅲ Unit PR >240 >1000 μA⋅lm-1 SNR >12.7 >16.2 - RES >25 >36 lp⋅mm-1 Gain >2400 >6400 cd⋅m-2⋅lx-1 EBI <2.5×10-7 <2.5×10-7 lx MTTF 2000 - Hour Shock resistance >75 >75 g Manufacture DEP ITT - 表 3 二代与三代像增强器观察视距比较
Table 3 Recognized distance for Gen Ⅱ and Gen Ⅲ image intensifier
Scene illumination/lx Gen Ⅱ Gen Ⅲ 1×10-2 1 1.15 1×10-3 1 1.42 7×10-4 1 1.51 表 4 不同生产商三代像增强器的主要性能比较
Table 4 Major parameters of Gen Ⅲ image intensifier of different manufactures
Parameters Image intensifier model & manufacturer Unit XX1520(by AEG) XX1530(by DEP) *( by LEP) ANVIS(by ITT) PR > 1000 > 1000 >1000 >1000 μA⋅lm-1 SNR > 16.2 > 16.2 >15 >16.2 - RES > 36 > 36 >35 >36 lp⋅mm-1 Gain > 6400 > 6400 >6400 >6400 cd⋅m-2⋅lx-1 EBI < 2.5×10-7 < 2.5×10-7 < 2.5×10-7 <2.5×10-7 lx MTTF 7500 7500 7500 - Hour Shock resistance 75 75 75 >75 g Note:*without a model for sale 表 5 二代、超二代以及三代像增强器的主要区别
Table 5 Major differences between Gen Ⅱ, Super Gen Ⅱ and Gen Ⅲ image intensifier
Image intensifier Gen Ⅱ Super Gen Ⅱ Gen Ⅲ Input window Fiber-optic plate Glass Glass AR film - - Si3N4 Photocathode Na2KSb Na2KSb GaAs Cathode voltage 200 V 200 V >400 V Ion barrier - - Al2O3 Sealing technology Thermal sealing Thermal sealing Cold sealing Vacuum <10-5 Pa <10-5 Pa <10-8 Pa 表 6 不同像增强器的主要性能比较
Table 6 Major parameters of different image intensifiers
Image intensifier Super Gen Ⅱ Super Gen Ⅱ Gen Ⅲ Unit Model XX1700 XX1610 ANVIS - PR >500 >500 >1000 μA⋅lm-1 SNR > 18.9 >15.5 >16.2 - RES >36 >36 >36 lp⋅mm-1 Gain >12000 >6400 >6400 cd⋅m-2⋅lx-1 EBI <2.5×10-7 <2.5×10-7 <2.5×10-7 lx MTTF 10000 7500 7500 Hour Shock resistance > 500 >500 >75 g Manufacturer DEP Philips ITT - 表 7 二代、超二代以及三代像增强器观察视距比较
Table 7 Recognized distance for Gen Ⅱ, Super Gen Ⅱ and Gen Ⅲ image intensifiers
Scene illumination
/lxGen Ⅱ Super Gen Ⅱ Gen Ⅲ 1×10-2 1 1.12 1.15 1×10-3 1 1.35 1.42 7×10-4 1 1.41 1.51 表 8 超二代与三代像增强生产成本分析
Table 8 Analysis on cost of Super Gen Ⅱ and Gen Ⅲ
Super Gen Ⅱ Gen Ⅲ Equipment Low vacuum(< 10-5 Pa) Very high vacuum(< 10-8 Pa) Technique Short process chain, high efficiency and high yield Long process chain, low efficiency and low yield 表 9 像增强器性能参数比较
Table 9 Comparison between different image intensifier
PR/μA⋅lm-1 SNR RES/lp⋅mm-1 Gain/cd⋅m-2⋅lx-1 EBI/lx 1123# 872 25.7 64 16000 1.6×10-7 1171# 765 26.2 64 16000 0.9×10-7 表 10 Omnibus计划的三代像增强器
Table 10 Parameters of Gen Ⅲ image intensifier in Omnibus procurements
Omnibus Ⅲ Omnibus Ⅳ Omnibus Ⅴ Omnibus Ⅵ Unit PR 1350 1800 1800 2000 μA⋅lm-1 RES 51 64 64 64 lp⋅mm-1 SNR 19 21 21 25 - Gain 12500-22500 12500-22500 12500-22500 15000-22500 cd⋅m-2⋅lx-1 Year 1990 1996 1999 2002 - 表 11 超二代像增强器性能指标
Table 11 Parameters of Super Gen Ⅱ image intensifier
SHD-3 XD-4 XR-5 XP-6 Unit PR 500 600 700 1000 μA⋅lm-1 RES 50 60 64 64 lp⋅mm-1 SNR 18 20 25 28 - Gain 10000-16000 10000-17500 10000-17500 15000-20000 cd⋅m-2⋅lx-1 Year 1999 2000 2002 2014 - 表 12 像增强器性能参数比较
Table 12 Comparison between different image intensifier
RES/lp⋅mm-1 SNR FOM EBI/lx Gain/cd⋅m-2⋅lx-1 1144# 64 28.1 1800 0.7×10-7 18000 1151# 64 28.3 1800 1.5×10-7 12000 -
[1] 张敬贤, 李玉丹, 金伟其. 微光与红外成像技术[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 1995: 29-35. ZHANG Jingxian, LI Yudan, JIN Weiqi. Low-light-level and Infrared Imaging Technology[M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 1995: 29-35.
[2] 周立伟, 刘玉岩. 目标探测与识别[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2002: 79-100. ZHOU Liwei, LIU Yuyan. Object Detection and Origin[M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2002: 79-100.
[3] 程宏昌, 石峰, 李周奎, 等. 微光夜视器件划代方法初探[J]. 应用光学, 2021, 42(6): 1092-1101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYGX202106023.htm CHENG Hongchang, SHI Feng, LI Zhoukui, et al. Preliminary study on distinguishment method of low-level-light night vision devices[J]. Journal of Applied Optics, 2021, 42(6): 1092-1101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYGX202106023.htm
[4] 郭晖, 向世明, 田民强. 微光夜视技术发展动态评述[J]. 红外技术, 2013, 35(2): 63-68. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/hwjs201302003 GUO Hui, XIANG Shiming, TIAN Minqiang. A review of development of low light level night vision technology[J]. Infrared Technology, 2013, 35(2): 63-68. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/hwjs201302003
[5] 田金生. 低照度微光传感器的最新进展[J]. 红外技术, 2013, 35(9): 527-534. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/hwjs201309001 TIAN Jinsheng. New development of low level imaging sensor technology[J]. Infrared Technology, 2013, 35(9): 527-534. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/hwjs201309001
[6] Laprade B N, Reinhart S T, Wheeler M, et al. Low-noise-figure microchannel plate optimized for Gen III image intensification systems[C/OL]//SPIE of Electron Image Tubes and Image Intensifiers, 1990, 1243: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.19476.
[7] Feller W B. Low noise and conductively cooled microchannel plates[C]//Proc. of SPIE Electron Image Tubes and Image Intensifiers, 1990, 1243:doi: 10.1117/12.19475.
[8] Conti L, Barnstedt J, Hanke L, et al. MCP Detector Development for UV Space Missions[J]. Astrophysics and Space Science, 2018, 363(4): 63-71. DOI: 10.1007/s10509-018-3283-4
[9] 周异松. 电真空成像器件及理论分析[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1989. ZHOU Yisong. Electric Vacuum Imaging Device and Its Theoretical Analysis[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1989.
[10] 向世明, 倪国强. 光电子成像器件原理[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2006. XIANG Shiming, NI Guoqiang. The Principle of Photoelectronic Imaging Device[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2006.
[11] 常本康. 多碱光电阴极[M]. 北京: 兵器工业出版社, 2001. CHANG Benkang. Multi-Alkali Photocathode[M]. Beijing: Ordnance Industry Press, 2001.
[12] 李晓峰, 刘如彪, 赵学峰. 多碱阴极光电发射机理研究[J]. 光子学报, 2011, 40(9): 1438-1441. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB201212008.htm LI Xiaofeng, LIU Rubiao, ZHAO Xuefeng. Photoemission mechanism of multi-alkali cathode[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2011, 40(9): 1438-1441. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB201212008.htm
[13] 李晓峰, 陆强, 李莉, 等. 超二代像增强器多碱阴极膜厚测量研究[J]. 光子学报, 2012, 41(11): 1377-1381. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB201211023.htm LI Xiaofeng, LU Qiang, LI Li. Thickness measurement of multi-alkali photocathode[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2012, 41(11): 1377-1381. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB201211023.htm
[14] 李晓峰. 超二代像增强器多碱阴极光电发射特性研究[J]. 光子学报, 2013, 42(1): 1435-1440. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB201301001.htm LI Xiaofeng. Photoemission process study of multi-alkali photocathode in the super second generation image intensifier[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2013, 42(1): 1435-1440. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB201301001.htm
[15] 李晓峰, 杨文波, 王俊. 用光致荧光研究多碱阴极光电发射机理[J]. 光子学报, 2012, 41(12): 1435-1440. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB201212008.htm LI Xiaofeng, YANG Wenbo, WANG Jun. Photoemission mechanism of multi-alkali photocathode by photoluminescence[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2012, 41(12): 1435-1440. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB201212008.htm
[16] 常本康. GaAs光电阴极[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001. CHANG Benkang. GaAs Photocathode[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2001.
[17] 常本康. GaAs基光电阴极[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017. CHANG Benkang. Photocathode Base on GaAs[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017.
[18] ZHANG Yijun, CHANG Benkang, YANG Zhi, et al. Distributuion of carriers in gradient-doping transmission-mode GaAs photocathodes grown by molecular beam epitaxy[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2009, 18(10): 4541-4546. DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/18/10/074
[19] ZHAO Jing, CHANG Benkang, XIONG Yajuan, et al. Influence of the antireflection, window and active layers on optical properties of exponential-doping transmission-mode GaAs photocade modules[J]. Optics Communications, 2012, 285(5): 589-593.
[20] 李晓峰, 张景文, 高宏凯, 等. 三代管MCP离子阻挡膜研究[J]. 光子学报, 2001, 30(12): 1496-1499. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB200112014.htm LI Xiaofeng, ZHANG Jingwen, GAO Hongkai, et al. Ion barrier of MCP in the third generation image intensifier[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2001, 30(12): 1496-1499. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB200112014.htm
[21] 杨晓军, 李丹, 乔凯, 等. 防离子反馈微通道板表面碳污染去除的试验研究[J]. 红外技术, 2020, 42(8): 747-751. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/hwjs202008007 YANG Xiaojun, LI Dan, QIAO Kai, et al. Experimental study of C pollution removal from microchannel plate with ion barrier film[J]. Infrared Technology, 2020, 42(8): 509-518. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/hwjs202008007
[22] Jan Van Spijker. Ion barrier membrane for use in a vacuum tube using electron multiplying, an electron multiplying structure for use in a vacuum tube using electron multiplying as well as a vacuum tube using electron multiplying provided with such an electron multiplying structure[P]. U. S. : 8, 471, 444B2[P]. [2013-01-25].
[23] Roaux E, Richard J C, Piaget C. Third-Generation Image Intensifier[J]. Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, 1985, 64A: 71-75.
[24] Pollehn H K. Performance and reliability of third-generation image intensifier[J]. Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, 1985, 64A: 61-69.
[25] Jacques Dupuy, Joost Schrijvers, Gerard Wolzak. The super second generation image intensifier[C/OL]//SPIE, 1989, 1072: 0014.
[26] Bosch L A, Boskma L. The Performance of DEP Super Generation Image Intensifier[C]//Proc. of SPIE, 1994, 2272: 110212.
[27] YAN Baojin, LIU Shulin, HENG Yuekun. Nano-oxide thin films deposited via atomic layer deposition on microchannel[J]. Nanoscale Research Letters, 2015, 10(1): 1-10.
[28] 丛晓庆, 邱祥彪, 孙建宁, 等. 原子层沉积法制备微通道板发射层的特性[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2016, 45(9): 0916002. CONG Xiaoqing, QIU Xiangbiao, SUN Jianning, et al. Properties of microchannel plate emission layer deposited by atomic layer deposition[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2016, 45(9): 1-10.
[29] Nutzel G. Image intensifier for night vision device[P]. U. S. : Patent 0, 886, 095B2, [2021-01-05].
[30] 山东鑫茂奥耐特复合固体润滑工程技术有限公司. 一种金属表面超声波镶嵌纳米金刚石的方法[P]. 中国: CN201510283605, [2015-08-20]. Shandong Xingmao aonaite compound lubricating oil technology company. A method of ultrasonic embedding nano diamond on metal surface[P]. China: CN201510283605, [2015-08-20].
[31] 李晓峰, 李廷涛, 曾进能, 等. 微通道板输入信号利用率提高研究[J]. 光子学报, 2020, 49(3): 0325002. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB202003022.htm LI Xiaofeng, LI Tingtao, ZENG Jinneng, et al. Study on the improvement of input signal utilization of MCP[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2020, 49(3): 0325002. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB202003022.htm
[32] 李丹, 朱宇峰, 赵慧民, 等. MCP噪声因子特性研究[J]. 红外技术, 2017, 39(11): 1066-1070. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/hwjs201711016 LI Dan, ZHU Yufeng, ZHAO Huimin, et al. Research on noise factor characteristic of micro-channel plate[J]. Infrared Technology, 2017, 39(11): 1066-1070. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/hwjs201711016
[33] 李晓峰, 常乐, 李金沙, 等. 微通道板噪声因子与工作电压关系研究[J]. 光子学报, 2020, 49(7): 0725002. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB202007003.htm LI Xiaofeng, CHANG Le, LI Jinsha, et al. Study on the relationship between noise factor and working voltage of microchannel plate[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2020, 49(7): 0725002. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB202007003.htm
[34] 李晓峰, 张正君, 丛晓庆, 等. 微通道板结构参数对噪声因子的影响研究[J]. 光子学报, 2021, 50(5): 0225001. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB202104016.htm LI Xiaofeng, ZHANG Zhenjun, CONG Xiaoqing, et al. Influence of microchannel plate structure parameters on noise factor[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50(5): 0225001. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB202104016.htm
[35] 刘元震, 王仲春, 董亚强. 电子发射与光电阴极[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 1995. LIU Yuanzheng, WANG Zhongchun, DONG Yaqiang. Electron Emission and Photocathode[M]. Beijing: Beijing Science and Technology University Press, 1995.
[36] 法国甫托尼公司. 具有改善的吸收率的半透明的光电阴极[P]. 中国: CN104781903A. [2015-07-15]. Photonis France. Sem-transparent photocathode with improved absorption rate[P]. China: CN104781903A [2015-07-15].
[37] 李晓峰, 常乐, 曾进能, 等. 微通道板分辨力提高研究[J]. 光子学报, 2019, 48(12): 1223002. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB201912016.htm LI Xiaofeng, CHANG Le, ZENG Jinneng, et al. Study on resolution improvement of microchannel plate[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2019, 48(12): 1223002. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB201912016.htm
[38] 邱亚峰, 严武凌, 华桑暾. 基于电子追迹算法的微光像增强器分辨力研究[J]. 光子学报, 2020, 49(12): 1223003. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB202012003.htm QIU Yafeng, YAN Wuling, HUA Sangtun. Resolution research of low-light-level image intensifier based on electronic trajectory tracking[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2020, 49(12): 1223003. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB202012003.htm
[39] 李晓峰, 常乐, 赵恒, 等. 超二代与三代像增强器低照度分辨力比较研究[J]. 光子学报, 2021, 50(9): 0904003-1. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB202109030.htm LI Xiaofeng, CHANG Le, ZHAO Heng, et al. Comparison of resolution between Super Gen. Ⅱ and Gen. Ⅲ image intensifier[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50(9): 0904003-1. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZXB202109030.htm
[40] Hoenderken T H, Hagen C W, Nutzel G O, et al. Influence of the microchannel plate and anode gap parameters on the spatial resolution of an image intensifier[J]. Journal of Vaccum, Science and Technology, 2001, 19(30): 843-850.
[41] Nutzel G. Fiber optic phosphor screen comprising angular filter[P]. U. S. : 8, 933, 419B2 [2015-01-13].
[42] 潘京生. 像增强器的迭代性能及其评价标准[J]. 红外技术, 2020, 42(6): 509-518. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/hwjs202006001 PAN Jingsheng. Image intensifier upgraded performance and evaluation standard[J]. Infrared Technology, 2020, 42(6): 509-518. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/hwjs202006001
[43] 董煜辉, 黄丽书, 王俊, 等. 微光像增强器试验方法: WJ 2091-1992[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1992. DONG Yuhui, HUANG Lishu, WANG Jun, et al. Test method of image intensifier: WJ 2091-1992[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1992.
[44] 董煜辉, 黄丽书, 王俊, 等. 像增强器通用规范: GJB 2000A-2020 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020. DONG Yuhui, HUANG Lishu, WANG Jun, et al. General specification of image intensifier: GJB 2000A-2020[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020.
[45] 李晓峰, 何雁彬, 常乐, 等. 超二代与三代像增强器性能的比较研究[J]. 红外技术, 2022, 44(8): 764-777. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/f450e48d-1281-422f-8ab5-d725f5a0ce3d LI Xiaofeng, HE Yanbin, CHANG Le, et al. Performance comparison between super second generation and third generation image intensifiers[J]. Infrared Technology, 2022, 44(8): 764-777. http://hwjs.nvir.cn/article/id/f450e48d-1281-422f-8ab5-d725f5a0ce3d
[46] 周立伟. 关于微光像增强器的品质因数[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2004, 33(4): 331-337. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HWYJ200404001.htm ZHOU Liwei. On quality factor of low light level image intensifier[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2004, 33(4): 331-337. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HWYJ200404001.htm