Test of Infrared Radiation Characteristics of Aircraft and Study on Launch Strategy for Infrared Decoy Flare
-
摘要: 通过研究飞机的红外辐射特征，为干扰弹投放策略提供参考，采用光谱辐射计、中波热像仪、长波热像仪对飞机的静态红外辐射特性进行测试，选择迎头（0°）、正侧向（90°）、尾后（180°）共3个测试点，测试结果表明：迎头红外辐射强度和辐射面积均最小，尾后红外辐射强度最大，辐射面积较小，正侧向红外辐射面积最大，辐射强度较大。根据测试结果分析了飞机面临不同方向来袭导弹攻击时，红外干扰弹的投放使用策略。尾后攻击时，采用多点源和面源红外干扰弹；侧向攻击时，采用面源红外干扰弹；引头攻击时，采用多点源、面源红外干扰弹。Abstract: This study aims to investigate the infrared radiation characteristics of aircraft and provide a reference for the launch strategy for infrared decoy flares. A spectral radiometer, middle infrared thermal imager, and far infrared thermal imager were used to test the static infrared radiation performance of an aircraft. Three test points were selected: the head, positive side, and tail. The test results showed the following: (1) at the radiation intensity and radiation area of the head were the smallest; (2) the infrared radiation intensity of the tail was the largest; (3)the radiation area of the tail was small; (4) the infrared radiation area of the positive side was the largest; and (5) the radiation intensity of the positive side was large. Based on to the test results, the strategy for infrared decoy flares was analyzed. Multi-point and area infrared decoy flares are used for stern attacks; area infrared decoy flares are used for lateral attacks; and multi-point and area infrared decoy flares are used for head-on attacks.
-
Key words:
- infrared radiation of aircraft /
- infrared decoy flare /
- launch strategy
-
图 2 迎头测试中长波红外辐射强度随时间的关系图
Figure 2. Plot of middle-long wave infrared radiation intensity over time in head-on test
图 3 中波红外特征辐射面积随时间的变化关系图
Figure 3. Middle wave infrared characteristic radiation area over time
图 4 长波红外辐射面积随时间的变化关系图
Figure 4. Long wave infrared characteristic radiation area over time
表 1 飞机红外辐射特征测试结果汇总
Table 1. Summary of aircraft radiation characteristics test results
Test direction and angle Wave length Radiation intensity/(W/Sr) Radiation area/m2 Head-on 0° 3 to 5 μm 50.00 3.68 8 to 14 μm 50.00 5.40 Lateral 90° 3 to 5 μm 68.00 25.90 8 to 14 μm 150.00 12.53 Stern 180° 3 to 5 μm 140.00 8.85 8 to 14 μm 80.00 1.05 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 陈宁, 王刚, 王鹏, 等. 先进的机载红外诱饵对抗技术措施发展研究[J]. 航天电子对抗, 2017, 33(5): 27-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HTDZ201705008.htmCHENG Ning, WANG Gang, WANG Peng, et al. Research on the development of advanced airborne infrared decoy countermeasures[J]. Aerospace Electronic Countermeasures, 2017, 33(5): 27-31. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HTDZ201705008.htm [2] 马贤杰, 李国平, 王洪静, 等. 国外红外导引头及红外诱饵发展历程与展望[J]. 航天电子对抗, 2020, 36(3): 58-64.MA Xianjie, LI Guoping, WANG Hongjing. et al. Development roadmap and direction of infrared seekers and infrared decoys[J]. Aerospace Electronic Countermeasures, 2020, 36(3): 58-64. [3] 刘小军, 宋凯. 机载红外干扰弹的干扰原理分析[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2003, 23(1): 174-176. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DJZD2003S1025.htmLIU Xiaojun, SONG Kai. Interference principle of airborne infrared decoy flare[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2003, 23(1): 174-176. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DJZD2003S1025.htm [4] 符小卫. 机载探测与电子对抗原理[M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社, 2013.FU Xiaowei. Principles of Airborne Detection and Electronic Countermeasures[M]. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University Press, 2013. [5] 孔晓玲, 马胜贤, 杜玉萍. 面源红外干扰弹对抗红外成像制导导弹的仿真研究[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2011, 33(1): 78-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QBZH201101021.htmKONG Xiaoling, MA Shengxian, DU Yuping. Simulation research on surface-type infrared decoy for jamming infrared imaging guided missile[J]. Command Control and Simulation, 2011, 33(1): 78-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QBZH201101021.htm [6] 薛程泓. 基于蒙皮的红外辐射能量测量方法研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳大学, 2014.XUE Chenghong. Research on Infrared Radiation Energy Measurement Method Based on Skin[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang University, 2014. [7] 马榜, 万纯, 周建波, 等. 面源红外诱饵对多元红外导引头的干扰效能分析[J]. 航天电子对抗, 2016, 32(5): 12-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HTDZ201605004.htmMA Bang, WAN Chun, ZHOU Jianbo, et al. Interference effectiveness of surface-type IR decoy to multi-element IR missile seeker[J]. Aerospace Electronic Countermeasures, 2016, 32(5): 12-17. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HTDZ201605004.htm [8] 刘加丛, 刘占辰, 张恒喜, 等. 红外诱饵对点目标图像辐射特性干扰分析[J]. 红外技术, 2008, 30(1): 21-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8891.2008.01.005LIU Jiacong, LIU Zhanchen, ZHANG Hengxi, et al. Analysis of IR decoy countermeasure to the point target image radiation characteristics[J]. Infrared Technology, 2008, 30(1): 21-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8891.2008.01.005 [9] 李石川, 王刚, 陈元泰, 等. 机载红外诱饵技术及干扰策略研究[J]. 航天电子对抗, 2018, 34(2): 38-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HTDZ201802010.htmLI Shichuan, WANG Gang, CHEN Yuantai, et al. Study on airborne IR decoy technology and tactical strategy[J]. Aerospace Electronic Countermeasures, 2018, 34(2): 38-44. . https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HTDZ201802010.htm -
点击查看大图
图(4) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 176
- HTML全文浏览量: 71
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 0
